<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tips to Improve Your Search Ranking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.secondlife.com/2008/03/26/tips-to-improve-your-search-ranking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2008/03/26/tips-to-improve-your-search-ranking/</link>
	<description>By Linden Lab</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 00:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil Deakins</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2008/03/26/tips-to-improve-your-search-ranking/#comment-592583</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Deakins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindenlab.wordpress.com/?p=1777#comment-592583</guid>
		<description>Now, I can agree with that :)

Although targetting brand names and keywords that websites have nothing to do with has been going on since the brith of search engines, there isn't an accepted word or phrase to describe it. "Deceptive targetting" would suit it, since it can happen in Names as well as Descriptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, I can agree with that <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Although targetting brand names and keywords that websites have nothing to do with has been going on since the brith of search engines, there isn&#8217;t an accepted word or phrase to describe it. &#8220;Deceptive targetting&#8221; would suit it, since it can happen in Names as well as Descriptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Yeuxdoux</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2008/03/26/tips-to-improve-your-search-ranking/#comment-592581</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Yeuxdoux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindenlab.wordpress.com/?p=1777#comment-592581</guid>
		<description>Why make search case sensitive? Well... if you're looking for Polish sausage, would you be happy if you got results for shoe polish?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why make search case sensitive? Well&#8230; if you&#8217;re looking for Polish sausage, would you be happy if you got results for shoe polish?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeska Linden</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2008/03/26/tips-to-improve-your-search-ranking/#comment-592579</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeska Linden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindenlab.wordpress.com/?p=1777#comment-592579</guid>
		<description>I agree that it's different, although similar in desire to deceive people and "trick" them into visiting their site/increasing their ranking. To prevent any confusion, we should just call it "Deceptive Descriptions" and leave it at that. These tips are by no means an attempt to describe all of the many ways humans attempt to fool search engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it&#8217;s different, although similar in desire to deceive people and &#8220;trick&#8221; them into visiting their site/increasing their ranking. To prevent any confusion, we should just call it &#8220;Deceptive Descriptions&#8221; and leave it at that. These tips are by no means an attempt to describe all of the many ways humans attempt to fool search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Deakins</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2008/03/26/tips-to-improve-your-search-ranking/#comment-592576</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Deakins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindenlab.wordpress.com/?p=1777#comment-592576</guid>
		<description>Actually keyword stuffing is more akin to what you described in the original post, and in the KB, but it isn't that either, Jeska. What you described isn't even remotely similar to cloaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually keyword stuffing is more akin to what you described in the original post, and in the KB, but it isn&#8217;t that either, Jeska. What you described isn&#8217;t even remotely similar to cloaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeska Linden</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2008/03/26/tips-to-improve-your-search-ranking/#comment-592574</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeska Linden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindenlab.wordpress.com/?p=1777#comment-592574</guid>
		<description>As has been described above, the term "cloaking" is not directly akin on the Web as is inworld, but it has similar traits. 

Cloaking is used to describe behavior which involves presenting different content to search engine spiders than is presented to the browser when you visit the actual Web site. 

While cloaking doesn't happen exactly the same within Second Life as it does on the Web (because nothing happens exactly in Second Life as it does on the Web), we felt that the process of listing different content in your description than is included in your parcel was similar enough to include a link to a full description of cloaking (on &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloaking" rel="nofollow"&gt;wikipedia&lt;/a&gt;) for those who were curious instead of making up our own word for the behavior. 

The Search Team thought about using &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyword_stuffing" rel="nofollow"&gt;Key word Stuffing&lt;/a&gt; to describe it as well, but felt cloaking was closer to what is occurring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As has been described above, the term &#8220;cloaking&#8221; is not directly akin on the Web as is inworld, but it has similar traits. </p>
<p>Cloaking is used to describe behavior which involves presenting different content to search engine spiders than is presented to the browser when you visit the actual Web site. </p>
<p>While cloaking doesn&#8217;t happen exactly the same within Second Life as it does on the Web (because nothing happens exactly in Second Life as it does on the Web), we felt that the process of listing different content in your description than is included in your parcel was similar enough to include a link to a full description of cloaking (on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloaking" rel="nofollow">wikipedia</a>) for those who were curious instead of making up our own word for the behavior. </p>
<p>The Search Team thought about using <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyword_stuffing" rel="nofollow">Key word Stuffing</a> to describe it as well, but felt cloaking was closer to what is occurring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UNHAPPY OWNER</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2008/03/26/tips-to-improve-your-search-ranking/#comment-592561</link>
		<dc:creator>UNHAPPY OWNER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindenlab.wordpress.com/?p=1777#comment-592561</guid>
		<description>Sadly none of you on here seems to even care if your name or products name is used in someone elses land description to steal your traffic to worried about stupid one word keywords thats been going on in sl ad's forever.But oh well from the reply i got on here from Jeska sounds like doing that is allowed which i find to be very unethical all together but like i said on my last post lord help you if it was SL in your land description!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly none of you on here seems to even care if your name or products name is used in someone elses land description to steal your traffic to worried about stupid one word keywords thats been going on in sl ad&#8217;s forever.But oh well from the reply i got on here from Jeska sounds like doing that is allowed which i find to be very unethical all together but like i said on my last post lord help you if it was SL in your land description!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Deakins</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2008/03/26/tips-to-improve-your-search-ranking/#comment-592559</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Deakins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindenlab.wordpress.com/?p=1777#comment-592559</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, cloaking isn't possible in the SL search. Jeska was wrong when she used that word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, cloaking isn&#8217;t possible in the SL search. Jeska was wrong when she used that word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Deakins</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2008/03/26/tips-to-improve-your-search-ranking/#comment-592556</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Deakins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindenlab.wordpress.com/?p=1777#comment-592556</guid>
		<description>I can't see where it's stated not to use repeated keywords, but if people are doing things like putting "hair hair hair hair" into their description, it ain't gonna do much for 'em. It might have helped 12 or 13 years ago, but not since then. Even back in the days when pages were ranked according to content, AltaVista only counted the first 2 instances of each word in a page, and other engines would have done similar things to avoid spam being successful. Google does a little differently. The weight of each instance of a word decreases until the point where any further instances of the word have no weight at all.

Presumably the hair place will have more instances of "hair" in their objects' names and descriptions, so including "hair hair hair hair" anywhere is a waste of the limited characters, that could be used in much better ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see where it&#8217;s stated not to use repeated keywords, but if people are doing things like putting &#8220;hair hair hair hair&#8221; into their description, it ain&#8217;t gonna do much for &#8216;em. It might have helped 12 or 13 years ago, but not since then. Even back in the days when pages were ranked according to content, AltaVista only counted the first 2 instances of each word in a page, and other engines would have done similar things to avoid spam being successful. Google does a little differently. The weight of each instance of a word decreases until the point where any further instances of the word have no weight at all.</p>
<p>Presumably the hair place will have more instances of &#8220;hair&#8221; in their objects&#8217; names and descriptions, so including &#8220;hair hair hair hair&#8221; anywhere is a waste of the limited characters, that could be used in much better ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Most Popular Owner</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2008/03/26/tips-to-improve-your-search-ranking/#comment-592535</link>
		<dc:creator>Most Popular Owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindenlab.wordpress.com/?p=1777#comment-592535</guid>
		<description>Well done Linden Lab,

You tell everyone on this blog what NOT to do for the search i.e. cloaking and repeated keywords as its unethical.

So what does everyone do in the past 24 hours. Do exactly that and game the search system. If you look at all the new search strings now, everyone has adopted Cloaking and put things like "hair hair hair hair" in their descriptions.

I think you just signed the death warrant for an already gamed and inaccurate search engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done Linden Lab,</p>
<p>You tell everyone on this blog what NOT to do for the search i.e. cloaking and repeated keywords as its unethical.</p>
<p>So what does everyone do in the past 24 hours. Do exactly that and game the search system. If you look at all the new search strings now, everyone has adopted Cloaking and put things like &#8220;hair hair hair hair&#8221; in their descriptions.</p>
<p>I think you just signed the death warrant for an already gamed and inaccurate search engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khamon</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2008/03/26/tips-to-improve-your-search-ranking/#comment-592532</link>
		<dc:creator>Khamon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindenlab.wordpress.com/?p=1777#comment-592532</guid>
		<description>SL Universe sells advertisements that appear on Snapzilla!

http://www.sluniverse.com/advertising/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SL Universe sells advertisements that appear on Snapzilla!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sluniverse.com/advertising/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sluniverse.com/advertising/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
