<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Certain places, residents not found in “all” search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/</link>
	<description>By Linden Lab</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: domneth dingson</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-587709</link>
		<dc:creator>domneth dingson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 00:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-587709</guid>
		<description>@18  Trust me, I know how frustrated you are.  I'm having the same issue right now with my shop.  Number 3 or 4 on search for 'holodeck' or 'rezzer' and I get that same "page not available.  Please hit back and try someone else." message

This is beyond frustrating, and I had just started getting traffic again, once I figured out people don't even bother with the classified section anymore.  Unfortunately, I don't think this is the same issue as the original blog, since I do show up in search, it's just telling people I don't want them at my business.

I HATE your new search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@18  Trust me, I know how frustrated you are.  I&#8217;m having the same issue right now with my shop.  Number 3 or 4 on search for &#8216;holodeck&#8217; or &#8216;rezzer&#8217; and I get that same &#8220;page not available.  Please hit back and try someone else.&#8221; message</p>
<p>This is beyond frustrating, and I had just started getting traffic again, once I figured out people don&#8217;t even bother with the classified section anymore.  Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t think this is the same issue as the original blog, since I do show up in search, it&#8217;s just telling people I don&#8217;t want them at my business.</p>
<p>I HATE your new search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel Amarula</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-587061</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel Amarula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-587061</guid>
		<description>Is this also the cause of why friend's list sometimes says waiting on it and don't show you everyone that is on? Or is this something different entirely? If this has been answered before please excuse me and if you could include a link to that if there is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this also the cause of why friend&#8217;s list sometimes says waiting on it and don&#8217;t show you everyone that is on? Or is this something different entirely? If this has been answered before please excuse me and if you could include a link to that if there is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Blanchard</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-574457</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Blanchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-574457</guid>
		<description>I changed my description in my land settings and now my place doesn't show in the search...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I changed my description in my land settings and now my place doesn&#8217;t show in the search&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oryx Tempel</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-571133</link>
		<dc:creator>Oryx Tempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-571133</guid>
		<description>Hi James,
There's been a lot of debate amongst residents as to whether traffic actually counts in Search/All.  Can you clear this up for us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi James,<br />
There&#8217;s been a lot of debate amongst residents as to whether traffic actually counts in Search/All.  Can you clear this up for us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: o.h.</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-571091</link>
		<dc:creator>o.h.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-571091</guid>
		<description>i am having strange issues myself, my parcel does not show up in earch form one day to the next without the slightest change.
the strange thing is, i asked a friend and it shows up for her, just for me its blocked (and yes, weve been using exactly the same settings)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am having strange issues myself, my parcel does not show up in earch form one day to the next without the slightest change.<br />
the strange thing is, i asked a friend and it shows up for her, just for me its blocked (and yes, weve been using exactly the same settings)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo dryke</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-569839</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo dryke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-569839</guid>
		<description>any news?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any news?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JetZep Zabelin</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-568661</link>
		<dc:creator>JetZep Zabelin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-568661</guid>
		<description>Hi Rika and James =)  I am wishing you the best in sorting this out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rika and James =)  I am wishing you the best in sorting this out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles Beck</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-567025</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-567025</guid>
		<description>...echoing Evolving Yin's post, I never unclicked "Show in Search," either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;echoing Evolving Yin&#8217;s post, I never unclicked &#8220;Show in Search,&#8221; either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles Beck</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-567020</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-567020</guid>
		<description>The $30L per week I spend to be listed in Places isn't much, but it's completely wasted. My store is listed No. 1 in Search for New Year's Decorations, but when you click on the link, the result is "Page Not Available. ...Please hit "Back" and try another link." 

I've got a new (one month old) business, I've worked HARD, and now LL is telling people to go back and select a link for a different business. You have no idea how frustrated and angry I am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The $30L per week I spend to be listed in Places isn&#8217;t much, but it&#8217;s completely wasted. My store is listed No. 1 in Search for New Year&#8217;s Decorations, but when you click on the link, the result is &#8220;Page Not Available. &#8230;Please hit &#8220;Back&#8221; and try another link.&#8221; </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a new (one month old) business, I&#8217;ve worked HARD, and now LL is telling people to go back and select a link for a different business. You have no idea how frustrated and angry I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirley Marquez</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-566258</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley Marquez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/27/certain-places-residents-not-found-in-%e2%80%9call%e2%80%9d-search/#comment-566258</guid>
		<description>@15: Pal, the problem is that the Google Search Appliance is too clever; it recognized put-together words like "bodyart" and decomposes them, and then does the search based on relevance. Those other places probably have higher relevance scores (more traffic or whatever else they base the relevance score on), so your listing ends up being buried. I don't know of any good solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@15: Pal, the problem is that the Google Search Appliance is too clever; it recognized put-together words like &#8220;bodyart&#8221; and decomposes them, and then does the search based on relevance. Those other places probably have higher relevance scores (more traffic or whatever else they base the relevance score on), so your listing ends up being buried. I don&#8217;t know of any good solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
