<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updated Release Candidate Viewer: Second Life 1.18.6 RC1 Available Today!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/</link>
	<description>By Linden Lab</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Uh Oh</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-560294</link>
		<dc:creator>Uh Oh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 21:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-560294</guid>
		<description>Mimi says   "I think it will make it far more easier for those with bad intentions to hunt on kids if the IDV will be mentioned. Now kids are relatively safe from predators, since it’s hard to tell which people are underage and which aren’t."

That's a real good point Mimi.  That is all the more reason for everyone to IDV.
For that reason alone how can you argue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mimi says   &#8220;I think it will make it far more easier for those with bad intentions to hunt on kids if the IDV will be mentioned. Now kids are relatively safe from predators, since it’s hard to tell which people are underage and which aren’t.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a real good point Mimi.  That is all the more reason for everyone to IDV.<br />
For that reason alone how can you argue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New All Search Classified Change Coming Soon &#171; Official Linden Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-560285</link>
		<dc:creator>New All Search Classified Change Coming Soon &#171; Official Linden Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 21:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-560285</guid>
		<description>[...] do not have teleport clicks counted. This will be fixed when 1.18.6 is released early next month (1.18.6 is the current Release [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] do not have teleport clicks counted. This will be fixed when 1.18.6 is released early next month (1.18.6 is the current Release [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Finsbury</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-558531</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Finsbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-558531</guid>
		<description>I have a question. used winlight and my nividia 6600gt video card quit working after 3 months.
What caused it to crash is history. what I need to know is What is a good video card to replace it with that works with windows vista and second life with the best performance?
I am using a pci express slot on a amd 3800+ computer.
Any advice would be helpful. thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question. used winlight and my nividia 6600gt video card quit working after 3 months.<br />
What caused it to crash is history. what I need to know is What is a good video card to replace it with that works with windows vista and second life with the best performance?<br />
I am using a pci express slot on a amd 3800+ computer.<br />
Any advice would be helpful. thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Dowd</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-554906</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dowd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-554906</guid>
		<description>Well still no answer on verification status displaying in the profile - either here or on the jira issue.

If LL cannot be clear or consistent over the simple matter of whether your verification status is shared with others or not, why should we trust them over what other information they may share? If (as Argent suggests) they can't even get their privacy policy communicated within LL, why should we trust that they have communicated their privacy policy to third parties?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well still no answer on verification status displaying in the profile - either here or on the jira issue.</p>
<p>If LL cannot be clear or consistent over the simple matter of whether your verification status is shared with others or not, why should we trust them over what other information they may share? If (as Argent suggests) they can&#8217;t even get their privacy policy communicated within LL, why should we trust that they have communicated their privacy policy to third parties?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tegg B</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-554876</link>
		<dc:creator>Tegg B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-554876</guid>
		<description>A year ago we didn't have these stupid white paddocks of nothingness on each side while you squinted to read the tiny writing in the middle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A year ago we didn&#8217;t have these stupid white paddocks of nothingness on each side while you squinted to read the tiny writing in the middle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mimi</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-554624</link>
		<dc:creator>mimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-554624</guid>
		<description>@33
where else can we reply? the IDV blogs are capped at 150 posts.
As long as people don't get an answer, they will keep asking. For many of us beeing able to access some areas is crucial, yet we don't know what the lindens are up to. I guess we will not ever know either, we will just be pushed into it. Gives good reason to complain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@33<br />
where else can we reply? the IDV blogs are capped at 150 posts.<br />
As long as people don&#8217;t get an answer, they will keep asking. For many of us beeing able to access some areas is crucial, yet we don&#8217;t know what the lindens are up to. I guess we will not ever know either, we will just be pushed into it. Gives good reason to complain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the bat</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-554578</link>
		<dc:creator>the bat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-554578</guid>
		<description>@33 Ok here is my question. Is every blog post that mentions age verification going to trigger everyone to complain about it?

Yeah , as long as all the blog posts about the topic are 
1/ capped at 150
2/ filled to capacity rapidly
3/ filled with still unanswered questions 

the issue is obviously very important to a large majority of users and deserves far more space than its had so far to resolve .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@33 Ok here is my question. Is every blog post that mentions age verification going to trigger everyone to complain about it?</p>
<p>Yeah , as long as all the blog posts about the topic are<br />
1/ capped at 150<br />
2/ filled to capacity rapidly<br />
3/ filled with still unanswered questions </p>
<p>the issue is obviously very important to a large majority of users and deserves far more space than its had so far to resolve .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alicia Mounier</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-554574</link>
		<dc:creator>Alicia Mounier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-554574</guid>
		<description>Yeah I age verified recently for this beta but it says I'm not age verified. Lol, so am I or not? When I go to the age verify page it says I'm already verified. So I'm guessing that you don't have info on grid connected with the age verification yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I age verified recently for this beta but it says I&#8217;m not age verified. Lol, so am I or not? When I go to the age verify page it says I&#8217;m already verified. So I&#8217;m guessing that you don&#8217;t have info on grid connected with the age verification yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Heying</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-554552</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Heying</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-554552</guid>
		<description>@26 Maria: I have also set up a 16M2 ageverify parcel in my sim  with some could be broadly offensive porn in it. The kids can stand millimeters away... my group can get in - even the kids - as my group is open access. The point is this releases fixes a bug, not.

@ 33 Rocky: If the lindens were doing their job and not just the usual Robin Linden "Let them eat cake" crud she love foisting on us the blogs would not have an arbitrary 150 post limit (A year ago there were blogs with 1500+ posts) and there would be more trying to address our concerns.

Cory was the wrong one for Philip to fire, Robin is getting worse with each and every policy she and her church dream up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@26 Maria: I have also set up a 16M2 ageverify parcel in my sim  with some could be broadly offensive porn in it. The kids can stand millimeters away&#8230; my group can get in - even the kids - as my group is open access. The point is this releases fixes a bug, not.</p>
<p>@ 33 Rocky: If the lindens were doing their job and not just the usual Robin Linden &#8220;Let them eat cake&#8221; crud she love foisting on us the blogs would not have an arbitrary 150 post limit (A year ago there were blogs with 1500+ posts) and there would be more trying to address our concerns.</p>
<p>Cory was the wrong one for Philip to fire, Robin is getting worse with each and every policy she and her church dream up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alyx Sands</title>
		<link>http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-554550</link>
		<dc:creator>Alyx Sands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/12/12/updated-release-candidate-viewer-second-life-1186-rc1-available-today/#comment-554550</guid>
		<description>You can see in your OWN profile whether you're age verified or not, not in that of others. And that it isn't showing in the RELEASE CANDIDATE viewer is just a bug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can see in your OWN profile whether you&#8217;re age verified or not, not in that of others. And that it isn&#8217;t showing in the RELEASE CANDIDATE viewer is just a bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
