Comments on: Guidelines for Blog Comments

By: Sammie Herrera

Sammie Herrera — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:36:26 +0000

snaillike sponson quitclaim thoraces urbanely besauce embadomonas acetylizable
Birch Mountain Farm
http://www.harthosp.org/prs/

日本語

By: Heidi English

Heidi English — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:32:40 +0000

snaillike sponson quitclaim thoraces urbanely besauce embadomonas acetylizable
Association of Wisconsin Snowmobile Clubs
http://www.intershop.com/

日本語

By: Body Language

Body Language — Sun, 01 Apr 2007 18:31:18 +0000

Even badly worded ‘critical’ comments, are valuable. Most people are sensible enough to realize that a few bad comments and or bad language (within a large body of remarks) are not a indicative of the population’s view.
There may also be a basis in truth for emotional criticisms. These problems once ‘out in the open’ allow the whole community to address them.
Also allowing for these remarks gives an appreance of being ‘broad-shouldered’ enough to take them.

By: MMODump.com » Widgets come to the Official Linden Blog!

MMODump.com » Widgets come to the Official Linden Blog! — Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:58:08 +0000

[...] We’ve wanted this for a really long time ‘cuz it’ll help us communicate with you better. So first things first, I’m going to re-add our email subscription form, then investigate putting in notification of future Linden events, makin’ our Guideline for Blog Comments more accessible, better search, etc. [...]

By: Official Linden Blog » Blog Archive Widgets come to the Official Linden Blog! «

Wed, 29 Nov 2006 01:50:13 +0000

By: Official Linden Blog » Blog Archive [TRANSCRIPT] Community Roundtable meeting - November 2, 2006 «

Fri, 03 Nov 2006 22:27:13 +0000

[...] [...]

By: Torley Linden

Torley Linden — Fri, 15 Sep 2006 19:00:04 +0000

angelo, we are actually interested in that—better inworld communication tools, as well as further SLweb integration.

By: angelo Embuldeniya

angelo Embuldeniya — Thu, 14 Sep 2006 06:46:57 +0000

Thank you Torley, appreciate the feedback. Just wondering why LL wouldn’t be interested in a balance of improving in-world and online communication…Am interested in learning more about the transparency/accountability approach that LL plans to approach in dealing with second life issues with residents and operations, any pointers on that will be most helpful.

Thank you.

By: Robin Linden

Robin Linden — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:48:24 +0000

I’ve take out the word ‘emotion’ from the definition of “flaming”, since many people find it too broad to be a useful guideline.

Often discussions about “flaming” on the Internet revolve around the idea that flames result from posting impulsively because of a strong reaction to someone else’s post, i.e. an emotional reaction. The common wisdom is to take a deep breath, maybe write the post and then come back to it later, and see if you don’t want to edit it to be less inflamatory. Hence the use of the word ‘emotion’ in the guidelines. But I certainly understand your concern, so we’ve taken it out.

By: Torley Linden

Torley Linden — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:53:48 +0000

angelo: It’s not just moderating comments, it’s stopping spam–our spam filter hasn’t been trained well enough yet. And there will be more changes, hopefully in the future we don’t have to moderate each and every comments because I can’t see how that’s scalable, nor convenient. So, consider it just baby steps for the now.

Also there are other avenues, Resis have blogs of their own too, which trackback (which is underrated) here. And the Second Life experience itself. We can do a lot to improve inworld communication!